GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Impact vs CoreJJ

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ImpactWinner
84.6

Impact wins: Longevity

CoreJJ
84.6

CoreJJ wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Esports

Shareable URL · /compare/impact-lol-vs-corejj-lol

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong
84.6

Impact leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. World champion with SK Telecom T1 in 2013 and a long-serving North American top laner.

1. Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong
84.6
2. Jo "CoreJJ" Yong-in
84.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Trophies per season

Career timeline · Trophies per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through split year 5 · Trophies per season
1. 🇰🇷 Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong5 split years played · career day 1,825426 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇷 Jo "CoreJJ" Yong-in5 split years played · career day 1,825378 trophies
-11.3% vs Impact at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇰🇷 Impact0096180426752
🇰🇷 CoreJJ0058124378718

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricImpactActiveCoreJJActive
World Championship titles11
LCS titles33
LCK titles2
World Championship appearances65
Professional seasons1312
LCS MVP awards1
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%9286
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%8284

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Impact84.6
CoreJJ84.6
The people
Impact
CoreJJ

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Impact vs CoreJJ. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →