Who is better, Impact or JW?
Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Jesper "JW" Wecksell — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong and Jesper "JW" Wecksell level at 84.6. Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong leads on Longevity. Jesper "JW" Wecksell leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Impact wins: Longevity
JW wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/impact-lol-vs-jw-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Impact leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Impact | 0 | 0 | 96 | 180 | 426 | 752 |
| 🇸🇪 JW | 0 | 0 | 60 | 136 | 412 | 716 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Jesper "JW" Wecksell — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
JW scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Impact leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Impact: 84.6, JW: 84.6.
Make your case for Impact vs JW. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.