Who is better, De Bruijn or Kromowidjojo?
Inge de Bruijn leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 85.5 for Ranomi Kromowidjojo — a gap of 4.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Inge de Bruijn above Ranomi Kromowidjojo: 89.5 vs 85.5. Inge de Bruijn leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →De Bruijn wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Kromowidjojo wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/inge-de-bruijn-vs-ranomi-kromowidjojo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
De Bruijn leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 De Bruijn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| 🇳🇱 Kromowidjojo | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | De BruijnRetired | KromowidjojoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 8 | 5 |
| World Championship golds | 5 | 5 |
| World records set | 11 | — |
| European titles | 9 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| European Championship golds | — | 15 |
| Short-course world records | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteInge de Bruijn leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 85.5 for Ranomi Kromowidjojo — a gap of 4.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kromowidjojo does not lead any of the five categories; De Bruijn is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. De Bruijn: 89.5, Kromowidjojo: 85.5.
Make your case for De Bruijn vs Kromowidjojo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.