Who is better, Kristiansen or Ottey?
Ingrid Kristiansen leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.6 for Merlene Ottey — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ingrid Kristiansen above Merlene Ottey: 87.8 vs 87.6. Ingrid Kristiansen leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Merlene Ottey leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kristiansen wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Ottey wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ingrid-kristiansen-vs-merlene-ottey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kristiansen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Kristiansen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 |
| 🇯🇲 Ottey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KristiansenRetired | OtteyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 4 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| London Marathon wins | 2 | — |
| Boston Marathon wins | 1 | — |
| World cross country titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 9 |
| World Championship medals | — | 14 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 7 |
| 200m best (sec) | — | 21.64 |
| World Indoor golds | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Ingrid Kristiansen leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.6 for Merlene Ottey — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ottey scores higher on longevity. Kristiansen leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kristiansen: 87.8, Ottey: 87.6.
Make your case for Kristiansen vs Ottey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.