Who is better, Kristiansen or Banks?
Ingrid Kristiansen leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Willie Banks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ingrid Kristiansen above Willie Banks: 87.8 vs 87.7. Ingrid Kristiansen leads on Dominance, Honours. Willie Banks leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kristiansen wins: Dominance, Honours
Banks wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ingrid-kristiansen-vs-willie-banks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kristiansen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Kristiansen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 |
| 🇺🇸 Banks | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 281 | 639 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KristiansenRetired | BanksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 4 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| London Marathon wins | 2 | — |
| Boston Marathon wins | 1 | — |
| World cross country titles | 1 | — |
| World records set | — | 1 |
| World record in centimetres | — | 1,797 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| US titles | — | 6 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Ingrid Kristiansen leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Willie Banks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Banks scores higher on peak, longevity. Kristiansen leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kristiansen: 87.8, Banks: 87.7.
Make your case for Kristiansen vs Banks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.