GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Babakova vs Waitz

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WaitzWinner
88.3

Waitz wins: Dominance, Honours

Babakova
86.4

Babakova wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Athletics

Shareable URL · /compare/inha-babakova-vs-grete-waitz

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇴 Grete Waitz
88.3

Waitz leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Nine New York Marathon wins and the first women's world marathon title.

1. Grete Waitz
88.3
2. Inha Babakova
86.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Major golds per season

Career timeline · Major golds per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Major golds per season
1. 🇳🇴 Grete Waitz5 seasons played · career day 3,28615 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇦 Inha Babakova5 seasons played · career day 3,2869.9 major golds
-34.0% vs Waitz at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇦 Babakova00001.969.92
🇳🇴 Waitz0000115

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBabakovaRetiredWaitzRetired
World titles1
Olympic medals11
World indoor medals4
Personal best in metres2.05
Olympic appearances4
New York Marathon wins9
World Championship golds1
World cross country titles5
Marathon world records4
Dominance w25%8288
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%8886
Honours w20%8286
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Waitz88.3
Babakova86.4
The people
Babakova
Waitz

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Babakova vs Waitz. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →