Who is better, Anderson or Martinenghi?
Nicolò Martinenghi leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.3 for Iona Anderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nicolò Martinenghi above Iona Anderson: 81.4 vs 81.3. Nicolò Martinenghi leads on Longevity. Iona Anderson leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Martinenghi wins: Longevity
Anderson wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/iona-anderson-vs-nicolo-martinenghi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Martinenghi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 392 | 480 |
| 🇮🇹 Martinenghi | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 294 | 748 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonActive | MartinenghiActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic medals | 2 | 4 |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Australian titles | 4 | — |
| National records set | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Italian records | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Nicolò Martinenghi leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.3 for Iona Anderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Martinenghi leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 81.3, Martinenghi: 81.4.
Make your case for Anderson vs Martinenghi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.