Who is better, Belova or Barrios?
Irina Belova leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Yarelys Barrios — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Irina Belova above Yarelys Barrios: 83.3 vs 83.2. Irina Belova leads on Peak, Honours. Yarelys Barrios leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Belova wins: Peak, Honours
Barrios wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/irina-belova-vs-yarelys-barrios
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Belova leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Belova | 0 | 0 | 45 | 107 | 373 | 644 |
| 🇨🇺 Barrios | 0 | 0 | 45 | 98 | 308 | 650 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BelovaRetired | BarriosRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| World Indoor titles | 1 | — |
| Heptathlon personal best | 6,845 | — |
| European medals | 1 | — |
| National titles | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Pan American titles | — | 2 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 6,853 |
| Diamond League wins | — | 5 |
| Central American titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Irina Belova leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Yarelys Barrios — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Barrios scores higher on statistics, longevity. Belova leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Belova: 83.3, Barrios: 83.2.
Make your case for Belova vs Barrios. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.