Who is better, Kirillova or Negrão?
Irina Kirillova leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.3 for Marcelo Negrão — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Irina Kirillova above Marcelo Negrão: 84.4 vs 84.3. Irina Kirillova leads on Longevity. Marcelo Negrão leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kirillova wins: Longevity
Negrão wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/irina-kirillova-vs-marcelo-negrao
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kirillova leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Kirillova | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 254 | 706 |
| 🇧🇷 Negrão | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KirillovaRetired | NegrãoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 4 | — |
| Years at the top level | 19 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic MVP awards | — | 1 |
| World League titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup medals | — | 1 |
| Brazil caps | — | 280 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Irina Kirillova leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.3 for Marcelo Negrão — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Negrão scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Kirillova leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kirillova: 84.4, Negrão: 84.3.
Make your case for Kirillova vs Negrão. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.