Who is better, Sekachova or Barsosio?
Sally Barsosio leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Iryna Sekachova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sally Barsosio above Iryna Sekachova: 81.6 vs 81.5. Sally Barsosio leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Iryna Sekachova leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Barsosio wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Sekachova wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/iryna-sekachova-vs-sally-barsosio
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Barsosio leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 Sekachova | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
| 🇰🇪 Barsosio | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 26 | 44 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SekachovaRetired | BarsosioRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Ukrainian titles | 6 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | 2 |
| Personal best (m) | 74 | — |
| World Championship finals | 3 | — |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| 10,000 m personal best | — | 1,852.66 |
| African Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Sally Barsosio leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Iryna Sekachova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sekachova scores higher on longevity. Barsosio leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sekachova: 81.5, Barsosio: 81.6.
Make your case for Sekachova vs Barsosio. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.