Who is better, Bagyula or Asari?
Junko Asari leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 74.9 for István Bagyula — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Junko Asari above István Bagyula: 75.4 vs 74.9. Junko Asari leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. István Bagyula leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Asari wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Bagyula wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/istvan-bagyula-vs-junko-asari
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Asari leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇺 Bagyula | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 376 | 688 |
| 🇯🇵 Asari | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 367 | 599 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BagyulaRetired | AsariRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Personal best (m) | 5.9 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Hungarian national titles | 6 | — |
| World outdoor titles | — | 1 |
| Marathon personal best | — | 2.262 |
| Osaka Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Global championships contested | — | 2 |
| Marathons completed | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 76 |
Junko Asari leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 74.9 for István Bagyula — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bagyula scores higher on longevity. Asari leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bagyula: 74.9, Asari: 75.4.
Make your case for Bagyula vs Asari. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.