GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Boros vs Cao

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BorosWinner
84.1

Boros wins: Longevity, Statistics

Cao
84.1

Cao wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/istvan-boros-vs-cao-yanhua

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇭🇺 István Boros
84.1

Boros leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. World team champion with Hungary in 1979.

1. István Boros
84.1
2. Cao Yanhua
84.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Cao Yanhua5 seasons played · career day 1,826416 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇭🇺 István Boros5 seasons played · career day 1,825375 titles
-9.9% vs Cao at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇭🇺 Boros0055120375699
🇨🇳 Cao0064142326660

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBorosRetiredCaoRetired
World Championship gold medals1
European Championship medals2
Hungarian titles3
World Championship appearances4
Swaythling Cup titles1
World Championship singles titles2
World Championship team titles4
World Cup titles1
Asian Championship titles3
World Championship medals8
Dominance w25%8086
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8070
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Boros84.1
Cao84.1
The people
Boros
Cao

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Boros vs Cao. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →