Who is better, Pedroso or Chizhova?
Iván Pedroso leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Nadezhda Chizhova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Iván Pedroso above Nadezhda Chizhova: 88.8 vs 88.7. Iván Pedroso leads on Longevity, Honours. Nadezhda Chizhova leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pedroso wins: Longevity, Honours
Chizhova wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ivan-pedroso-vs-nadezhda-chizhova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pedroso leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇺 Pedroso | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 19 |
| 🇷🇺 Chizhova | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PedrosoRetired | ChizhovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| World Championship golds | 4 | — |
| World indoor titles | 4 | — |
| Best jump in metres | 8.71 | — |
| Pan American golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World records | — | 8 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Best put in metres | — | 21.45 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Iván Pedroso leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Nadezhda Chizhova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chizhova scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Pedroso leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pedroso: 88.8, Chizhova: 88.7.
Make your case for Pedroso vs Chizhova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.