Who is better, Zaytsev or Van de Velde?
Steven van de Velde leads with a GOAT score of 73.1 against 72.6 for Ivan Zaytsev — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Steven van de Velde above Ivan Zaytsev: 73.1 vs 72.6. Steven van de Velde leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Ivan Zaytsev leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Van de Velde wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Zaytsev wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/ivan-zaytsev-vs-steven-van-de-velde-vb
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Van de Velde leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Zaytsev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 57 |
| 🇳🇱 Van de Velde | 0 | 0 | 44 | 92 | 258 | 533 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ZaytsevActive | Van de VeldeActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 3 | — |
| World League medals | 4 | — |
| World Tour titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| European Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| National titles | — | 2 |
| World Tour podiums | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 76 |
Steven van de Velde leads with a GOAT score of 73.1 against 72.6 for Ivan Zaytsev — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zaytsev scores higher on peak, dominance. Van de Velde leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zaytsev: 72.6, Van de Velde: 73.1.
Make your case for Zaytsev vs Van de Velde. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.