Who is better, Bugajenkovs or Hyden?
Ivans Bugajenkovs leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.3 for John Hyden — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ivans Bugajenkovs above John Hyden: 87.6 vs 87.3. Ivans Bugajenkovs leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. John Hyden leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bugajenkovs wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Hyden wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ivans-bugajenkovs-vs-john-hyden-bv
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bugajenkovs leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇻 Bugajenkovs | 0 | 0 | 58 | 123 | 276 | 690 |
| 🇺🇸 Hyden | 0 | 0 | 52 | 107 | 294 | 591 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BugajenkovsRetired | HydenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Soviet league titles | 6 | — |
| National team years | 11 | — |
| AVP titles | — | 27 |
| FIVB World Tour medals | — | 12 |
| AVP Most Valuable Player awards | — | 1 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 24 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Ivans Bugajenkovs leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.3 for John Hyden — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hyden scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bugajenkovs leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bugajenkovs: 87.6, Hyden: 87.3.
Make your case for Bugajenkovs vs Hyden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.