Who is better, Aikins or Cartwright?
Jack Aikins leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.1 for Jack Cartwright — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jack Aikins and Jack Cartwright level at 79.1. Jack Aikins leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Jack Cartwright leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Aikins wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Cartwright wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-aikins-vs-jack-cartwright
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Aikins leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Aikins | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 356 | 612 |
| 🇦🇺 Cartwright | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 272 | 703 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AikinsActive | CartwrightActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| NCAA finals | 6 | — |
| United States national medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 1 | — |
| Junior national titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Commonwealth Games medals | — | 2 |
| Australian titles | — | 4 |
| Junior world titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Jack Aikins leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.1 for Jack Cartwright — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cartwright scores higher on longevity. Aikins leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Aikins: 79.1, Cartwright: 79.1.
Make your case for Aikins vs Cartwright. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.