Who is better, Blackham or Barrington?
Jack Blackham leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Ken Barrington — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jack Blackham and Ken Barrington level at 85.6. Jack Blackham leads on Longevity, Honours. Ken Barrington leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Blackham wins: Longevity, Honours
Barrington wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-blackham-vs-ken-barrington
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Blackham leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Blackham | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 286 | 626 |
| 🏴 Barrington | 0 | 0 | 40 | 87 | 271 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BlackhamRetired | BarringtonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Tests played | 35 | 82 |
| Test dismissals | 60 | — |
| First-class dismissals | 456 | — |
| Tests as captain | 8 | — |
| Test debut match number | 1 | — |
| Test runs | — | 6,806 |
| Batting average | — | 59 |
| Test centuries | — | 20 |
| First-class centuries | — | 76 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 94 |
Jack Blackham leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Ken Barrington — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Barrington scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Blackham leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Blackham: 85.6, Barrington: 85.6.
Make your case for Blackham vs Barrington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.