Who is better, Brown or Archer?
Jack Brown leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for Jofra Archer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Brown above Jofra Archer: 83.9 vs 83.8. Jack Brown leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jofra Archer leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brown wins: Longevity, Statistics
Archer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-brown-cricket-vs-jofra-archer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brown leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Brown | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 286 | 626 |
| 🇬🇧 Archer | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 292 | 684 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrownRetired | ArcherActive · Rajasthan Royals |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 470 | — |
| Test centuries | 1 | — |
| First-class runs | 17,920 | — |
| First-class centuries | 29 | — |
| Record opening stand | 554 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| World Cup wickets in 2019 | — | 20 |
| Test wickets | — | 50 |
| Twenty20 international wickets | — | 40 |
| Fastest delivery recorded in km/h | — | 154 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Jack Brown leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for Jofra Archer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Archer scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Brown leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brown: 83.9, Archer: 83.8.
Make your case for Brown vs Archer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.