GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Carrington vs Beregi

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BeregiWinner
77.8

Beregi wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Carrington
77.7

Carrington wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/jack-carrington-vs-dora-beregi

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Dora Beregi
77.8

Beregi leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship medallist and multiple English national champion.

1. Dora Beregi
77.8
2. Jack Carrington
77.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇬🇧 Dora Beregi5 seasons played · career day 2,19118 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jack Carrington5 seasons played · career day 2,55616 titles
-11.1% vs Beregi at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Carrington0000922
🇬🇧 Beregi0002928

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCarringtonRetiredBeregiRetired
World Championship appearances68
England caps70
English national medals4
Coaching books written8
Career span in years2115
World Championship medals2
English national titles4
International caps60
Dominance w25%6870
Peak w20%8486
Longevity w20%8680
Honours w20%7274
Statistics w15%8282

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Beregi77.8
Carrington77.7
The people
Carrington
Beregi

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Carrington vs Beregi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →