GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Crawford vs Barnett

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BarnettWinner
80.6

Barnett wins: Longevity, Statistics

Crawford
80.1

Crawford wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/jack-crawford-cricket-vs-kim-barnett

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Kim Barnett
80.6

Barnett leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Scored more than 28,000 first-class runs in a 26-season county career.

1. Kim Barnett
80.6
2. Jack Crawford
80.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Kim Barnett5 years played · career day 2,1916,200 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jack Crawford5 years played · career day 1,826490 runs
-92.1% vs Barnett at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Crawford0040130380720
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Barnett0009004,70010,750

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCrawfordRetiredBarnettRetired
Tests played124
Test wickets39
First-class wickets1,146
First-class runs9,48828,593
Career years20
First-class centuries61
Seasons played26
List A runs12,016
Dominance w25%7472
Peak w20%9084
Longevity w20%7894
Honours w20%7466
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Barnett80.6
Crawford80.1
The people
Crawford
Barnett

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Crawford vs Barnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →