Who is better, Crawford or Lee?
Jack Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Lizelle Lee — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jack Crawford and Lizelle Lee level at 80.1.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Crawford wins: no category outright
Lee wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-crawford-cricket-vs-lizelle-lee
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Crawford leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 40 | 130 | 380 | 720 |
| 🇿🇦 Lee | 0 | 0 | 120 | 400 | 1,720 | 3,720 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CrawfordRetired | LeeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Tests played | 12 | — |
| Test wickets | 39 | — |
| First-class wickets | 1,146 | — |
| First-class runs | 9,488 | — |
| Career years | 20 | — |
| ODI runs | — | 3,011 |
| ODI centuries | — | 5 |
| T20 international runs | — | 1,896 |
| ICC ODI Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| International career years | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Jack Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Lizelle Lee — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lee does not lead any of the five categories; Crawford is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crawford: 80.1, Lee: 80.1.
Make your case for Crawford vs Lee. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.