Who is better, Hobbs or Muralitharan?
Muttiah Muralitharan leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 90.6 for Jack Hobbs — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Muttiah Muralitharan above Jack Hobbs: 90.7 vs 90.6. Muttiah Muralitharan leads on Honours, Statistics, Peak. Jack Hobbs leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Muralitharan wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Hobbs wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-hobbs-vs-muralitharan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Muralitharan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Hobbs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 49 |
| 🇱🇰 Muralitharan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 128 | 413 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HobbsRetired | MuralitharanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 61,760 | — |
| First-class centuries | 199 | — |
| Test runs | 5,410 | — |
| Test average | 56.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 15 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 800 |
| ODI wickets | — | 534 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 67 |
| Ten-wicket matches | — | 22 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| Test bowling average | — | 22.72 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Muttiah Muralitharan leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 90.6 for Jack Hobbs — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hobbs scores higher on longevity. Muralitharan leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hobbs: 90.6, Muralitharan: 90.7.
Make your case for Hobbs vs Muralitharan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.