AthletesTeams
Hobbs vs Armstrong
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HobbsWinner
90.6Hobbs wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Armstrong
87.1Armstrong wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/jack-hobbs-vs-warwick-armstrong
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Jack Hobbs
90.6
Hobbs leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jack Hobbs
2. Warwick Armstrong
Category breakdown
Season form · Centuries per year
Career timeline · Centuries per year
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Centuries per year1. 🇦🇺 Warwick Armstrong5 years played · career day 1,825218 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Jack Hobbs5 years played · career day 2,55529 runs
-86.7% vs Armstrong at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Hobbs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 49 |
| 🇦🇺 Armstrong | 0 | 0 | 35 | 74 | 218 | 472 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hobbs90.6
Armstrong87.1
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hobbs vs Armstrong. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.