Who is better, Laviolette or MacKinnon?
Jack Laviolette leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Nathan MacKinnon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Laviolette above Nathan MacKinnon: 83.0 vs 82.9. Jack Laviolette leads on Longevity, Honours. Nathan MacKinnon leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Laviolette wins: Longevity, Honours
MacKinnon wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-laviolette-vs-nathan-mackinnon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Laviolette leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Laviolette | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 242 | 662 |
| 🇨🇦 MacKinnon | 0 | 0 | 63 | 101 | 303 | 648 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LavioletteRetired | MacKinnonActive · Colorado Avalanche |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | 1 |
| Professional seasons | 15 | — |
| NHA games | 178 | — |
| Franchise founding roles | 1 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Hart Trophies | — | 1 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 950 |
| 100-point seasons | — | 4 |
| All-Star selections | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Jack Laviolette leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Nathan MacKinnon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MacKinnon scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Laviolette leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Laviolette: 83.0, MacKinnon: 82.9.
Make your case for Laviolette vs MacKinnon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.