GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Nava vs De La Hoya

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
NavaWinner
84.1

Nava wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

De La Hoya
84.0

De La Hoya wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/jackie-nava-vs-oscar-de-la-hoya

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇲🇽 Jackie Nava
84.1

Nava leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Mexico's first women's world champion and a pioneer of the sport there.

1. Jackie Nava
84.1
2. Oscar De La Hoya
84.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Oscar De La Hoya5 years played · career day 1,82620 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇲🇽 Jackie Nava5 years played · career day 1,82517 title wins
-15.0% vs De La Hoya at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇲🇽 Nava00371726
🇺🇸 De La Hoya00161732

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricNavaRetiredDe La HoyaRetired
World titles3
Professional wins4039
Career knockouts16
Professional bouts47
Career span in years20
Career losses6
Wins by knockout30
World titles in weight classes6
Olympic golds1
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%8682
Honours w20%8086
Statistics w15%8682

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Nava84.1
De La Hoya84.0
The people
Nava
De La Hoya

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Nava vs De La Hoya. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →