Who is better, Kallis or Devine?
Jacques Kallis leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.6 for Sophie Devine — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jacques Kallis and Sophie Devine level at 89.6. Jacques Kallis leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics. Sophie Devine leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kallis wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Devine wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jacques-kallis-vs-sophie-devine
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kallis leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Kallis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 196 | 427 |
| 🇳🇿 Devine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 100 | 268 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KallisRetired | DevineActive |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 13,289 | — |
| Test wickets | 292 | — |
| Test centuries | 45 | — |
| ODI runs | 11,579 | 4,000 |
| Test average | 55.37 | — |
| ICC Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Fastest women's T20I century (balls) | — | 36 |
| T20I runs | — | 3,500 |
| International seasons | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Jacques Kallis leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.6 for Sophie Devine — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Devine scores higher on peak, honours. Kallis leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kallis: 89.6, Devine: 89.6.
Make your case for Kallis vs Devine. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.