Who is better, Jaedong or JerAx?
Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Jaedong — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka above Jaedong: 85.6 vs 85.5. Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka leads on Peak, Honours. Jaedong leads on Statistics, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →JerAx wins: Peak, Honours
Jaedong wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jaedong-vs-jerax-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
JerAx leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Jaedong | 0 | 0 | 48 | 110 | 330 | 556 |
| 🇫🇮 JerAx | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 269 | 701 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JaedongRetired | JerAxRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Starleague titles | 3 | — |
| MSL titles | 3 | — |
| Proleague titles | 4 | — |
| Career win rate (%) | 68 | — |
| Premier finals | 12 | — |
| The International titles | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| The International appearances | — | 6 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 6.4 |
| Professional seasons | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Jaedong — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jaedong scores higher on dominance, statistics, longevity. JerAx leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jaedong: 85.5, JerAx: 85.6.
Make your case for Jaedong vs JerAx. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.