Who is better, Alguersuari or Piastri?
Jaime Alguersuari leads with a GOAT score of 62.2 against 60.0 for Oscar Piastri — a gap of 2.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jaime Alguersuari above Oscar Piastri: 62.2 vs 60.0. Jaime Alguersuari leads on Longevity, Statistics. Oscar Piastri leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Alguersuari wins: Longevity, Statistics
Piastri wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jaime-alguersuari-vs-oscar-piastri
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Alguersuari leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Alguersuari | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 31 | 33 |
| 🇦🇺 Piastri | 0 | 0 | 97 | 389 | 1,069 | 1,069 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlguersuariRetired | PiastriActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix starts | 46 | — |
| Career points | 31 | — |
| British F3 titles | 1 | — |
| Best race finish | 7 | — |
| Formula E starts | 11 | — |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 9 |
| Podiums | — | 25 |
| Pole positions | — | 6 |
| Sprint wins | — | 2 |
| Best championship finish | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 54 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 60 | 40 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 52 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 70 |
Jaime Alguersuari leads with a GOAT score of 62.2 against 60.0 for Oscar Piastri — a gap of 2.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Piastri scores higher on dominance, honours. Alguersuari leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alguersuari: 62.2, Piastri: 60.0.
Make your case for Alguersuari vs Piastri. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.