Who is better, Ingebrigtsen or Bartels?
Jakob Ingebrigtsen leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Ralf Bartels — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jakob Ingebrigtsen and Ralf Bartels level at 81.9. Jakob Ingebrigtsen leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Ralf Bartels leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ingebrigtsen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Bartels wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jakob-ingebrigtsen-vs-ralf-bartels
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ingebrigtsen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Ingebrigtsen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 17 |
| 🇩🇪 Bartels | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 278 | 597 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | IngebrigtsenActive | BartelsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| European golds | 8 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| 1500m best (sec) | 205.63 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| German titles | — | 5 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 2,140 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 60 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Jakob Ingebrigtsen leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Ralf Bartels — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bartels scores higher on longevity. Ingebrigtsen leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ingebrigtsen: 81.9, Bartels: 81.9.
Make your case for Ingebrigtsen vs Bartels. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.