Who is better, Ingebrigtsen or Ayhan?
Jakob Ingebrigtsen leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.7 for Süreyya Ayhan — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jakob Ingebrigtsen above Süreyya Ayhan: 81.9 vs 81.7. Jakob Ingebrigtsen leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Süreyya Ayhan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ingebrigtsen wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Ayhan wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jakob-ingebrigtsen-vs-sureyya-ayhan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ingebrigtsen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Ingebrigtsen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 17 |
| 🇹🇷 Ayhan | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 366 | 472 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | IngebrigtsenActive | AyhanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| European golds | 8 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| 1500m best (sec) | 205.63 | — |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best (1500m) | — | 3 |
| Turkish titles | — | 4 |
| World indoor medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 60 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Jakob Ingebrigtsen leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.7 for Süreyya Ayhan — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ayhan scores higher on longevity. Ingebrigtsen leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ingebrigtsen: 81.9, Ayhan: 81.7.
Make your case for Ingebrigtsen vs Ayhan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.