Who is better, Chase or Miller?
Ja'Marr Chase leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Von Miller — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ja'Marr Chase above Von Miller: 84.1 vs 84.0. Ja'Marr Chase leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Von Miller leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chase wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Miller wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jamarr-chase-vs-von-miller
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chase leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Chase | 0 | 0 | 1,455 | 2,501 | 6,625 | 6,625 |
| 🇺🇸 Miller | 0 | 0 | 11.5 | 30 | 60 | 106 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChaseActive · Cincinnati Bengals | MillerActive |
|---|---|---|
| Receiving triple crowns | 1 | — |
| Offensive Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 4 | — |
| Career receiving yards | 6,000 | — |
| Receiving touchdowns | 50 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 2 |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Pro Bowl selections | — | 8 |
| Career sacks | — | 129.5 |
| All-Pro first teams | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Ja'Marr Chase leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Von Miller — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Miller scores higher on honours, longevity. Chase leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chase: 84.1, Miller: 84.0.
Make your case for Chase vs Miller. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.