GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Anderson vs Sobers

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AndersonWinner
92.9

Anderson wins: Longevity

Sobers
92.7

Sobers wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/james-anderson-vs-garry-sobers

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 James Anderson
92.9

Anderson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. The most prolific fast bowler in Test history with 704 wickets.

1. James Anderson
92.9
2. Garry Sobers
92.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇧🇧 Garry Sobers5 years played · career day 2,190267 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 James Anderson5 years played · career day 1,825206 runs
-22.8% vs Sobers at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Anderson003066206470
🇧🇧 Sobers00040195460

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAndersonRetiredSobersRetired
Test wickets704235
Tests played188
Five-wicket hauls32
ODI wickets269
Bowling average26
Test runs8,032
Test centuries26
Highest Test score365
Test batting average57.78
Dominance w25%9094
Peak w20%9496
Longevity w20%9888
Honours w20%8890
Statistics w15%9696

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Anderson92.9
Sobers92.7
The people
Anderson
Sobers

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Anderson vs Sobers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →