GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Anderson vs Waugh

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AndersonWinner
92.9

Anderson wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Waugh
92.7

Waugh wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/james-anderson-vs-steve-waugh

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 James Anderson
92.9

Anderson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. The most prolific fast bowler in Test history with 704 wickets.

1. James Anderson
92.9
2. Steve Waugh
92.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 James Anderson5 years played · career day 1,825206 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Steve Waugh5 years played · career day 2,55618 runs
-91.3% vs Anderson at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Anderson003066206470
🇦🇺 Waugh0000529

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAndersonRetiredWaughRetired
Test wickets704
Tests played188
Five-wicket hauls32
ODI wickets269
Bowling average26
Test runs10,927
Test centuries32
World Cup titles2
Test wins as captain41
Test matches168
Dominance w25%9092
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%9892
Honours w20%8894
Statistics w15%9694

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Anderson92.9
Waugh92.7
The people
Anderson
Waugh

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Anderson vs Waugh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →