GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Parke vs Schiavone

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ParkeWinner
81.0

Parke wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Schiavone
80.8

Schiavone wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/james-cecil-parke-vs-francesca-schiavone

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇪 James Cecil Parke
81.0

Parke leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Australasian champion in 1912 and also an Ireland rugby international.

1. James Cecil Parke
81.0
2. Francesca Schiavone
80.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇮🇪 James Cecil Parke5 seasons played · career day 2,55643 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Francesca Schiavone5 seasons played · career day 2,5567 titles
-83.7% vs Parke at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇪 Parke00002546
🇮🇹 Schiavone0000410

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricParkeRetiredSchiavoneRetired
Grand Slam singles titles11
Grand Slam mixed titles2
Davis Cup titles1
Rugby caps for Ireland20
Career years17
WTA titles8
Fed Cup titles4
Career-high ranking4
Career match wins528
Dominance w25%7472
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%8090
Honours w20%7878
Statistics w15%8680

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Parke81.0
Schiavone80.8
The people
Parke
Schiavone

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Parke vs Schiavone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →