Who is better, Harden or Holman?
Nat Holman leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for James Harden — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nat Holman above James Harden: 83.9 vs 83.8. Nat Holman leads on Dominance, Honours. James Harden leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Holman wins: Dominance, Honours
Harden wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/james-harden-vs-nat-holman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Holman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Harden | 0 | 0 | 9.9 | 22.1 | 90.2 | 206.1 |
| 🇺🇸 Holman | 0 | 0 | 60 | 128 | 282 | 740 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HardenActive · Cleveland Cavaliers | HolmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Scoring titles | 3 | — |
| All-Star selections | 11 | — |
| Assist titles | 2 | — |
| Career points | 27,000 | — |
| Sixth Man of the Year | 1 | — |
| Professional championships | — | 3 |
| Seasons with the Original Celtics | — | 8 |
| Hall of Fame induction | — | 1,964 |
| Career professional games | — | 700 |
| Years at the top level | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 80 |
Nat Holman leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for James Harden — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Harden scores higher on statistics, longevity. Holman leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Harden: 83.8, Holman: 83.9.
Make your case for Harden vs Holman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.