Who is better, Kodeš or McLoughlin?
Jan Kodeš leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Maurice McLoughlin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jan Kodeš and Maurice McLoughlin level at 80.3. Jan Kodeš leads on Longevity, Honours. Maurice McLoughlin leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kodeš wins: Longevity, Honours
McLoughlin wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jan-kodes-vs-maurice-mcloughlin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kodeš leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Kodeš | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 295 | 644 |
| 🇺🇸 McLoughlin | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KodešRetired | McLoughlinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 3 | — |
| French Open titles | 2 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 1 | — |
| Major finals | 5 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | 1 |
| US Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 2 |
| World No. 1 rankings | — | 1 |
| Career span in years | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Jan Kodeš leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Maurice McLoughlin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McLoughlin scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Kodeš leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kodeš: 80.3, McLoughlin: 80.3.
Make your case for Kodeš vs McLoughlin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.