Who is better, Vertonghen or Son?
Jan Vertonghen leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Son Heung-min — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jan Vertonghen and Son Heung-min level at 80.7. Jan Vertonghen leads on Honours, Longevity. Son Heung-min leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Vertonghen wins: Longevity, Honours
Son wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jan-vertonghen-vs-son-heung-min
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Vertonghen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Vertonghen — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | VertonghenRetired | SonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium caps | 157 | — |
| Eredivisie titles | 3 | — |
| World Cup bronze medals | 1 | — |
| Premier League appearances | 236 | — |
| Champions League finals | 1 | — |
| Premier League goals | — | 127 |
| South Korea caps | — | 129 |
| South Korea goals | — | 50 |
| Asian Games gold medals | — | 1 |
| Europa League titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 85 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 65 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Jan Vertonghen leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Son Heung-min — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Son scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Vertonghen leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vertonghen: 80.7, Son: 80.7.
Make your case for Vertonghen vs Son. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.