Who is better, Vertonghen or Hoeneß?
Jan Vertonghen leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Uli Hoeneß — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jan Vertonghen and Uli Hoeneß level at 80.7. Jan Vertonghen leads on Longevity, Statistics. Uli Hoeneß leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Vertonghen wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hoeneß wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jan-vertonghen-vs-uli-hoeness
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Vertonghen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇪 Vertonghen | 0 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 120 | 254 |
| 🇩🇪 Hoeneß | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 314 | 650 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VertonghenRetired | HoeneßRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium caps | 157 | — |
| Eredivisie titles | 3 | — |
| World Cup bronze medals | 1 | — |
| Premier League appearances | 236 | — |
| Champions League finals | 1 | — |
| European Cups | — | 3 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| European Championships | — | 1 |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 3 |
| West Germany caps | — | 35 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 60 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Jan Vertonghen leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Uli Hoeneß — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hoeneß scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Vertonghen leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vertonghen: 80.7, Hoeneß: 80.7.
Make your case for Vertonghen vs Hoeneß. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.