Who is better, Železný or El Bakkali?
Soufiane El Bakkali leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.5 for Jan Železný — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Soufiane El Bakkali above Jan Železný: 90.6 vs 90.5. Soufiane El Bakkali leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics. Jan Železný leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →El Bakkali wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Železný wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jan-zelezny-vs-soufiane-el-bakkali
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
El Bakkali leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Železný | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87.66 | 543.98 |
| 🇲🇦 El Bakkali | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,445 | 3,356.08 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ŽeleznýRetired | El BakkaliActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | 2 |
| World Championship golds | 3 | 2 |
| World records | 5 | — |
| Javelin world record (m) | 98.48 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| Throws over 90 m | 34 | — |
| Steeplechase best | — | 477.08 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 1 |
| Global medals | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Soufiane El Bakkali leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.5 for Jan Železný — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Železný scores higher on longevity. El Bakkali leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Železný: 90.5, El Bakkali: 90.6.
Make your case for Železný vs El Bakkali. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.