Who is better, Novotná or Pegula?
Jana Novotná leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.4 for Jessica Pegula — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jana Novotná above Jessica Pegula: 78.5 vs 78.4. Jana Novotná leads on Honours, Longevity. Jessica Pegula leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Novotná wins: Longevity, Honours
Pegula wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jana-novotna-vs-jessica-pegula
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Novotná leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Novotná | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20 |
| 🇺🇸 Pegula | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NovotnáRetired | PegulaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 12 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| Career singles titles | 24 | — |
| Best world ranking | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 8 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 3 |
| Billie Jean King Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Jana Novotná leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.4 for Jessica Pegula — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pegula scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Novotná leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Novotná: 78.5, Pegula: 78.4.
Make your case for Novotná vs Pegula. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.