Who is better, Carvalho or Wlazły?
Jaqueline Carvalho leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Mariusz Wlazły — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jaqueline Carvalho and Mariusz Wlazły level at 87.0. Jaqueline Carvalho leads on Honours. Mariusz Wlazły leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carvalho wins: Honours
Wlazły wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jaqueline-carvalho-vs-mariusz-wlazly
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carvalho leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Carvalho | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 40 |
| 🇵🇱 Wlazły | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarvalhoRetired | WlazłyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Grand Prix titles | 8 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Club world titles | 2 | — |
| Pan American golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Polish league titles | — | 8 |
| PlusLiga career points | — | 8,000 |
| Polish MVP awards | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Jaqueline Carvalho leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Mariusz Wlazły — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wlazły scores higher on peak, longevity. Carvalho leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carvalho: 87.0, Wlazły: 87.0.
Make your case for Carvalho vs Wlazły. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.