Who is better, Kratochvílová or Chizhova?
Jarmila Kratochvílová leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.7 for Nadezhda Chizhova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jarmila Kratochvílová and Nadezhda Chizhova level at 88.7. Jarmila Kratochvílová leads on Peak. Nadezhda Chizhova leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kratochvílová wins: Peak
Chizhova wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jarmila-kratochvilova-vs-nadezhda-chizhova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kratochvílová leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Kratochvílová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 247.85 |
| 🇷🇺 Chizhova | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KratochvílováRetired | ChizhovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| World records | 2 | 8 |
| Olympic medals | 1 | 3 |
| 800m best (sec) | 113.28 | — |
| 400m best (sec) | 47.99 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Best put in metres | — | 21.45 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteJarmila Kratochvílová leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.7 for Nadezhda Chizhova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chizhova scores higher on honours. Kratochvílová leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kratochvílová: 88.7, Chizhova: 88.7.
Make your case for Kratochvílová vs Chizhova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.