Who is better, Bumrah or Tendulkar?
Sachin Tendulkar leads with a GOAT score of 94.4 against 88.8 for Jasprit Bumrah — a gap of 5.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sachin Tendulkar above Jasprit Bumrah: 94.4 vs 88.8. Sachin Tendulkar leads on Longevity, Statistics, Honours. Jasprit Bumrah leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tendulkar wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Bumrah wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/jasprit-bumrah-vs-tendulkar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tendulkar leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Bumrah — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Bumrah — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BumrahActive · Mumbai Indians | TendulkarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 217 | — |
| Bowling average | 19 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| ODI wickets | 149 | — |
| Test batting average | — | 53.78 |
| International centuries | — | 100 |
| Test runs | — | 15,921 |
| ODI runs | — | 18,426 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| Tests played | — | 200 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 93 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 100 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 98 |
Sachin Tendulkar leads with a GOAT score of 94.4 against 88.8 for Jasprit Bumrah — a gap of 5.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bumrah scores higher on peak. Tendulkar leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bumrah: 88.8, Tendulkar: 94.4.
Make your case for Bumrah vs Tendulkar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.