Who is better, Béliveau or Brodeur?
Jean Béliveau leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 90.0 for Martin Brodeur — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jean Béliveau and Martin Brodeur level at 90.0. Jean Béliveau leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Martin Brodeur leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Béliveau wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Brodeur wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jean-beliveau-vs-martin-brodeur
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Béliveau leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Béliveau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 429 |
| 🇨🇦 Brodeur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 242 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BéliveauRetired | BrodeurRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 10 | 3 |
| Hart Trophies | 2 | — |
| Art Ross Trophies | 1 | — |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | 1 | — |
| NHL points | 1,219 | — |
| All-Star selections | 13 | — |
| Career wins | — | 691 |
| Shutouts | — | 125 |
| Vezina Trophies | — | 4 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Games played | — | 1,266 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Jean Béliveau leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 90.0 for Martin Brodeur — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brodeur scores higher on statistics, longevity. Béliveau leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Béliveau: 90.0, Brodeur: 90.0.
Make your case for Béliveau vs Brodeur. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.