GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chandler vs Benvenuti

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChandlerWinner
85.0

Chandler wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Benvenuti
85.0

Benvenuti wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/jeff-chandler-vs-nino-benvenuti

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jeff Chandler
85.0

Chandler leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Undefeated as champion with nine bantamweight title defences.

1. Jeff Chandler
85.0
2. Nino Benvenuti
85.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Jeff Chandler5 years played · career day 1,826329 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Nino Benvenuti5 years played · career day 2,19140 title wins
-87.8% vs Chandler at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Chandler0045100242573
🇮🇹 Benvenuti00092753

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChandlerRetiredBenvenutiRetired
Title defences9
Career wins33
Knockouts18
World title reigns1
Career losses2
World titles2
Olympic golds1
Professional wins82
Career knockouts35
Professional bouts90
Dominance w25%8684
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7276
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%9088

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chandler85.0
Benvenuti85.0
The people
Chandler
Benvenuti

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chandler vs Benvenuti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →