GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chandler vs Cuevas

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChandlerWinner
85.0

Chandler wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Cuevas
84.9

Cuevas wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/jeff-chandler-vs-pipino-cuevas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jeff Chandler
85.0

Chandler leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Undefeated as champion with nine bantamweight title defences.

1. Jeff Chandler
85.0
2. Pipino Cuevas
84.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Jeff Chandler5 years played · career day 1,826329 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇲🇽 Pipino Cuevas5 years played · career day 1,82528 title wins
-91.5% vs Chandler at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Chandler0045100242573
🇲🇽 Cuevas005112844

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChandlerRetiredCuevasRetired
Title defences9
Career wins33
Knockouts18
World title reigns1
Career losses2
World title defences11
Professional wins35
Knockout wins31
Professional losses15
World titles won1
Dominance w25%8682
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7282
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%9088

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chandler85.0
Cuevas84.9
The people
Chandler
Cuevas

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chandler vs Cuevas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →