GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chandler vs Estrada

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChandlerWinner
85.0

Chandler wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Estrada
85.0

Estrada wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/jeff-chandler-vs-seniesa-estrada

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jeff Chandler
85.0

Chandler leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Undefeated as champion with nine bantamweight title defences.

1. Jeff Chandler
85.0
2. Seniesa Estrada
85.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Jeff Chandler5 years played · career day 1,826329 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Seniesa Estrada5 years played · career day 1,82511 title wins
-96.7% vs Chandler at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Chandler0045100242573
🇺🇸 Estrada00241121

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChandlerRetiredEstradaActive
Title defences9
Career wins33
Knockouts18
World title reigns1
Career losses2
Undisputed titles1
World titles4
Professional wins26
Professional losses0
Career knockouts9
Dominance w25%8684
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7278
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%9088

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chandler85.0
Estrada85.0
The people
Chandler
Estrada

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chandler vs Estrada. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →