Who is better, Mrdjenovich or Tyson?
Jelena Mrdjenovich leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Mike Tyson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jelena Mrdjenovich above Mike Tyson: 83.1 vs 83.0. Jelena Mrdjenovich leads on Longevity. Mike Tyson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mrdjenovich wins: Longevity
Tyson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jelena-mrdjenovich-vs-mike-tyson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mrdjenovich leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Mrdjenovich | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 27 |
| 🇺🇸 Tyson | 0 | 0 | 15 | 28 | 39 | 45 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MrdjenovichActive | TysonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles won | 6 | — |
| Professional wins | 42 | — |
| Knockout wins | 20 | — |
| World title fights | 24 | — |
| Career span in years | 20 | — |
| World titles | — | 4 |
| Career wins | — | 50 |
| Knockouts | — | 44 |
| Undisputed reigns | — | 1 |
| Title defences | — | 9 |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Jelena Mrdjenovich leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Mike Tyson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tyson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Mrdjenovich leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mrdjenovich: 83.1, Tyson: 83.0.
Make your case for Mrdjenovich vs Tyson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.