GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ostapenko vs Johansson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
OstapenkoWinner
79.1

Ostapenko wins: Dominance, Statistics

Johansson
79.0

Johansson wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/jelena-ostapenko-vs-thomas-johansson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇱🇻 Jeļena Ostapenko
79.1

Ostapenko leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Unseeded Roland-Garros champion in 2017 at the age of 20.

1. Jeļena Ostapenko
79.1
2. Thomas Johansson
79.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇱🇻 Jeļena Ostapenko5 seasons played · career day 2,92111 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Thomas Johansson5 seasons played · career day 2,1906 titles
-45.5% vs Ostapenko at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇱🇻 Ostapenko0000112
🇸🇪 Johansson000159

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricOstapenkoActiveJohanssonRetired
Grand Slam singles titles11
WTA titles9
Grand Slam doubles titles1
Career-high ranking57
Career match wins400
ATP titles9
Olympic golds1
Davis Cup finals2
Dominance w25%7470
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%7680
Honours w20%7476
Statistics w15%8482

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ostapenko79.1
Johansson79.0
The people
Ostapenko
Johansson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ostapenko vs Johansson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →