Who is better, Berndt or Calligaris?
Novella Calligaris leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.8 for Jens-Peter Berndt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Novella Calligaris above Jens-Peter Berndt: 80.9 vs 80.8. Novella Calligaris leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Jens-Peter Berndt leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Calligaris wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Berndt wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jens-peter-berndt-vs-novella-calligaris
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Calligaris leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Berndt | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 370 | 542 |
| 🇮🇹 Calligaris | 0 | 0 | 45 | 103 | 258 | 486 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BerndtRetired | CalligarisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| National titles | 8 | — |
| Olympic finals | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World records set | — | 1 |
| European medals | — | 3 |
| Italian titles | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Novella Calligaris leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.8 for Jens-Peter Berndt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Berndt scores higher on longevity. Calligaris leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Berndt: 80.8, Calligaris: 80.9.
Make your case for Berndt vs Calligaris. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.